PANAVISE 217 Mini Testa Porta Circuito, Argento 1- (Confezione)

Brand:Panavise

3.2/5

69.03

Mini testina portascheda per le basi della serie PanaVise 300. Progettato per circuiti stampati di piccole dimensioni fino a 4,5 pollici (114,3 mm) di larghezza. Perfetto per schede Arduino o Raspberry PI.

Le braccia si muovono liberamente per un posizionamento preciso. Leva di tensione della molla a sgancio rapido per facilitare l'inserimento o la rimozione della scheda. Inclina, gira e ruota. Bracci a regolazione rapida aperti fino a 4,5 pollici (114,3 mm) di larghezza. Il supporto ideale per circuiti stampati per schede componenti over-the-edge.
Brand Panavise
Color Silver
Country of Origin USA
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer No
Item model number 217
Item Weight 0.65 Pounds
Manufacturer PanaVise Industrial
Package Dimensions 7.6 x 5 x 2.3 inches; 10.4 Ounces

3.2

5 Review
5 Star
65
4 Star
11
3 Star
7
2 Star
8
1 Star
9

Scrivi la tua recensione

La tua mail non sarà pubblicata. Tutti i campi obbligatori sono segnati con*

Scritto da: Jay Barron
Lock Bar Mechanism Needs Work
I got the Panavise 217 today. I already had an old version of the bigger Model 315, and that one works like a charm. I wish I could say that about the Panavise 217. Mind you, the build is solid, the parts fit together as they're supposed do, etc. However, the 315 has screws that lock the arms in place when in use. The 217 has these little, spring loaded flip arms that are supposed to, somehow, keep the arms from sliding on the main support bar. They are completely useless. You can squeeze them (as per the instructions) if you wish, or don't squeeze them. It doesn't matter; the arms slide freely on the support bar. I will say that when a circuit board is clamped to the bars, they create enough tension to hold the board in place for the most part. However, even with a board tightly clamped into the arms, a gentle tug on the arm will pull it away and release your circuit board. I did sand the support arm with some heavy grade sandpaper, to rough it up a bit more, and that seemed to help... a little bit. I've never been disappointed with a Panavise product before. But that arm locking mechanism just does not work. I don't know if it is shoddy workmanship or what, but I'd replace that little arm lock mechanism with a screw based system, like its big brother. It is not unusable, just disappointing. Good, clean workmanship used to be a trademark of Panavise products. Things seem to have changed, unfortunately. UPDATE: I discovered the lock mechanism in both arms had burrs inside left over from the casting process. I took a shot and took the arms apart and filed down the burrs with a small, round file. I also saw that the locks were covered in a clear, green gunk (probably some sort of Loctite used in manufacturing). I removed that with acetone and gentle filing, then put the arms back together. NOW the arms lock like they are supposed to. I'm leaving my rating at 3-stars because everything I did should have been done at the factory. It is still a quality control issue.
Scritto da: Phantom Critic
Excellent!
Great for the smaller circuit boards. Fits the 350 vice series.
Scritto da: David Hinson
Defective junk
This might be suitable for its intended purpose if it was actually made correctly at the factory but it seems I will not know. When I put it together I could instantly see that the two arms were badly out of alignment. I fidgeted with it for a bit thinking I must've done something wrong but there's not much to it. They just didn't align like they're supposed to. But I decided to give it a try anyway. I attempted to mount a 2.5" PCB on it and there were problems from the start. When I tried to secure the board with the quick release clamp the arms were out of alignment so much that it put torque on the four cheap and already loosely fitting standoffs causing them to shift around and want to dislodge. But due to the way the standoff edges are made the board has to be in perfect alignment with all of them to make a secure hold otherwise they will actually work against a good hold due to their springiness. I tried to make some kind, any kind, of stable hold by shifting all of the little ill-fitting parts around in various ways but no joy. There's just no way I could trust this thing for real rework which sometimes requires a good amount of downward pressure. It would just come crashing down under its own ineptness. Ok so I must've got a bad unit. Ordered a replacement and Amazon was excellent about it as usual. But then it had the EXACT SAME defect. Wuh?? Attached is a photo of all four arms from both units mounted to the same crossbar. (And no, the crossbar is not defective it is perfectly formed.) The two quick release arms are in the rear. With the original order I also bought the model 203 for a different purpose. Fortunately, or sadly depending on how you look at it, it turns out to be a much more stable platform for small PCBs at about 2/3 the cost of this junk. I'd be perfectly happy with it except it is a bit bulkier and it elevates the piece higher above the stand which is a less comfortable position for work that requires a microscope. So you might want to consider a 203 (or anything else) as an alternative. Or you might try a different vendor who doesn't shamelessly capitalize on a MADE IN THE USA with flag logo displayed prominently on the box. Regardless there's no way I would recommend this product to anyone except maybe my foreign competitors.
Scritto da: hostile
Not as good as the others
Panvise has some nice vices and grabbers but this one cost just as much but seems put together cheaply. The arms are hard to adjust or keep adjustments
Scritto da: Carlos Morales M
Excelente producto
Excelente producto

Prodotti correlati

Scopri il nostro network internazionale

Spediamo in 28 paesi, oltre 200.000 prodotti. Resta aggiornato, iscriviti alla newsletter.

Shopping Cart