I'm 6'1', 195lb with a measured 33" waist and somewhat muscular with a well rounded figure skater but ;o). I wear 32" Jeans because of vanity sizing. (I like a more tailored fit). 32x34L Diesel larkees fit me just right. I bought these because from the pictures, I thought that they would be similar, so this is somewhat of a comparison review. These are the same price as Larkees when at full price, the only reason I bought these instead is because they were on sale (25% off). These fit about the same as the Diesel Larkees in the waist and seat area (which I fill in quite nicely). They are smaller in the leg area, not quite skinny jeans tight, just a tad tighter than expected for a "relaxed leg". They are significantly shorter as well (2" shorter than selected size, see note at bottom of review). They are still comfortable though due to good stretch and a soft thin material. They have a cheap feeling zipper fly as opposed to the heavy duty button up fly in the Larkees, which isn't a huge deal, but I prefer the button fly. The Diesel Larkees have thicker, but still stretchy and comfortable fabrick that "crumples" with extra length in the boot area, behind the knees and the upper thigh area that gives them a certain rugged look that I like. These jeans are too thin to hold those kind of natural creases, so they drape more like khakis, which is a different, less rugged look if that's what you are after. In the pictures, it looks like these jeans have the horizontal creases in the upper thigh, but this is just a die pattern meant to create the illusion of creases, which is a bit tacky for a $180 pair of jeans, but I guess it still looks good from a distance. Over all, for the sale price, I think they are an ok buy, but I definitely wouldn't buy then over the Diesels at full price. Fit and Sizing: (for "32x34" size selection) Inseam measures 32" (2" shorter than advertised) Wast measures 32" un-stretched, but stretches comfortably to 34" PN: T0046380S LADK Note: All measurements taken flat on floor I measured the inseam flat and the 32"X34" jeans that I ordered measure exactly 32" long in the inseam from the highest part of the crotch to the bottom of the hem. There is no indication of length anywhere on the packaging, so I'm not sure if this is the fault of the manufacturer or the creator of the listing, perhaps both. but the sizing chart needs to be fixed. Update: I received the "32x36" that I ordered, the inseam measures 35". So it appears that the inseam sizing is fairly inconstant compared to the size chart across the board. Since I was shooting for 34", I guess this will do. Too long is better than too short if you can sew. The second pair I received was used and without tags (shipped and sold by Amazon as new). The pockets are showing signs of wear at the top edges that the first pair I ordered did not have and there is a cologne smell. Since this is a product review and not a seller review, i'll refrain from taking off stars. Update #2: The elastic material in these jeans has no resilience whatsoever. When I first put them on, they were just right and had a nice tailored fit which was quite flattering in the seat area. After only a half day of wear, they loosened up a full size. They became baggy in the seat area and started to look more like a typical poorly fitting $50 pair of jeans. I have other pairs of jeans with the same amount of spandex in the blend and they don't do this nearly as much as these. They are still comfortable and maybe slightly better than a pair of Levis, but not worth price. If it weren't for the fact that they are now non-returnable, I would try a size down.
